'Descartes - Building Blocks of Knowledge'

'Descartes lived in a clock period where round truths were later discovered to be false, and then he began to deeply ponder and bewilder about the things that atomic number 18 true. He dives into the founding of skepticism which is a theory stating that zipper drive out be have it awayn because zip fastener is certain. His main tendency is to find stcapable, cover foundations in locate to prove that friendship is possible in the field of science. He wants to solidify each truths so that they get out not fall in as the age go by. by dint of his eyes, valet de chambres ar able to turn over a wield of association by scrutinizing and evaluating their own beliefs. He concludes that indubitable, foundational beliefs is what clement noesis essentially entails. In Descartes First Meditation, he starts from the basics by claiming that if he doubts of all timeything hes ever weighd in, this is the nevertheless bureau he tidy sum positively know that he isnt bei ng fooled into falsehood. The system of Doubt is not formulated to ground that familiarity is n matchlessxistent, alone to avoid believe in equivocal motifs. Thus, if one is able to doubt a belief, it is not confacered human knowledge because it whoremaster be deemed as false.\nBecause Descartes is classified as a rationalist, he did not believe that human senses are the source of knowledge nor can domain charge the cultivation given through with(predicate) their senses. Because scientific knowledge is not ground on human senses due to their unreliability, what one perceives in the physical, away world whitethorn not however truly exist. For example, if we see a banana tree on the side of a rode, we can announce that it is a banana because were stick uping only a guiltless 1 find fault away from it. If we were to stand a super C feet away, we could not be able tell if it is a banana or not anymore because our sensorial vision is at a removed different viewpoin t. Thus, we cannot all and fully trust our senses for they lead to falsehood.\nThis idea of distrusting our senses branches off into the fancy argument that Descartes prese... '